-
Michael J. Tyler
- February 9, 2025
Introduction
Deepfake pornography, the non-consensual creation and distribution of digitally manipulated explicit content, has emerged as a significant concern in Australia and globally. The ease with which artificial intelligence (AI) can superimpose a person’s likeness onto pornographic material poses severe ethical, psychological, and legal challenges. This essay explores the consequences of deepfake pornography on victims, examines case studies illustrating its impact, and analyses the legal recourse available in Australia while discussing the ramifications for perpetrators.
Consequences for Victims
Victims of deepfake pornography often suffer from profound psychological distress, reputational harm, and professional consequences. The violation of personal autonomy and dignity can lead to anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal. Furthermore, the internet’s permanence means that once such content is distributed, it is almost impossible to erase entirely, leading to prolonged suffering.
Case Study: Hannah Grundy (Australia)
Sydney school teacher Hannah Grundy discovered deepfake images of herself circulating online, created by a close acquaintance. These manipulated images, which included her personal details, led to severe emotional distress, social stigma, and professional ramifications. Despite efforts to remove the content, its continued circulation reinforced her trauma. The case highlighted the limitations of current legal frameworks in swiftly addressing the issue and punishing the perpetrator.
Case Study: Noelle Martin (Australia)
Noelle Martin, an Australian law student, became an outspoken advocate after discovering her images had been altered into pornographic content. Despite not being an active social media user, manipulated images of her were widely circulated on explicit websites. She faced years of online harassment, resulting in severe anxiety and depression. Her activism led to the introduction of new Australian laws criminalising image-based abuse, including deepfake pornography.
Legal Recourse for Victims
Australia has introduced legislative measures to combat deepfake pornography. The Enhancing Online Safety Act 2015 established the eSafety Commissioner, which allows victims to report non-consensual intimate images. Additionally, the Criminal Code Amendment (Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material) Act 2019 criminalises the non-consensual creation and distribution of deepfake pornography.
In 2023, Australian federal legislation strengthened penalties, making it a criminal offence to create or distribute non-consensual deepfake material, with perpetrators facing up to five years’ imprisonment and heavy fines. However, enforcement remains a challenge due to the anonymity of offenders and the cross-border nature of digital content.
Ramifications for Perpetrators
The legal consequences for perpetrators vary depending on the jurisdiction, but increasing efforts are being made to hold them accountable.
Case Study: Wilson v. Ferguson (Australia, 2015)
In this landmark civil case, the Western Australia Supreme Court ruled that the non-consensual distribution of intimate images constitutes a breach of confidence. The defendant, a man who shared explicit images of his former partner without her consent, was ordered to pay damages. This case set an important legal precedent for future cases involving image-based abuse, including deepfake pornography. (Wilson v Ferguson [2015] WASC 15)
International Legal Developments: The UK’s Approach to Deepfake Criminalisation
The UK government has recently announced plans to criminalise the creation and distribution of sexually explicit deepfake images without consent. Under the proposed legislation, individuals found guilty could face up to two years in prison. This initiative aims to address the growing concern over the misuse of AI technology to produce non-consensual explicit content. This development reflects the UK’s commitment to strengthening legal protections against image-based abuse and adapting to technological advancements.
Challenges in Legal Enforcement
Despite legal advancements, challenges remain:
- Anonymity of Offenders: Perpetrators often operate behind VPNs or anonymous networks, making prosecution difficult.
- Jurisdictional Issues: Deepfake content is frequently hosted on offshore platforms, complicating legal action.
- Technological Evolution: AI advancements make detection and prevention challenging.
- Lack of Awareness: Many victims are unaware of legal remedies available to them.
Conclusion
Deepfake pornography is a modern form of image-based abuse with devastating consequences for victims. While Australia has made significant strides in criminalising such offences, enforcement remains an ongoing battle. Increased awareness, technological countermeasures, and stronger international cooperation are essential to combat this growing issue effectively. As deepfake technology continues to evolve, so too must the legal frameworks designed to protect individuals from its malicious misuse.use with devastating consequences for victims.
